Know Your Rights! What is a One Stop? |
An Editorial By Mark Frieser, Chair, Sync Summit No matter what part of the sync business you’re in, nothing’s more important than 100% airtight rights clearance. Nothing. The quality of the music, its price, its “syncability,” who you know or where the music comes from – whatever – none of these factors matter if the music isn’t properly cleared. None of them. So why is it this central point – so simple, so logical and so clear to me and every music supervisor I know seem to be lost on so many rights holders? Frankly, I’m at a loss. Not knowing the clearance status of your rights is the quickest way to not only kill a single deal, but to be written off the “go-to” lists of every music supervisor and producer. Joe’s right you know. I personally felt that something so obvious in its importance to the sync process didn’t even bear repeating on our blog or at our conferences, but after a recent conversation, I’ve changed my mind. Let me explain. At one of our Sync Summits, a prominent music supervisor met a company purporting to possess “one-stop” licenses (master & publishing) for several tracks the music supervisor wanted to use in an upcoming project. Unfortunately, this wasn’t the case. In fact, after the music supervisor did some initial vetting of the tracks, it was found there were several uncleared samples interpolated in the tracks. Which isn’t exactly One-Stop, is it? More like Full Stop And just like that, the deal died, along with the chances of the rights holder to have a long-term business relationship with this music supervisor. All because a rep didn’t have their rights airtight. In this article, I’ll briefly lay out the why music supervisors like One Stops and what rights holders need to do in terms of best practices. First the why. WHY AIRTIGHT RIGHTS ARE SO IMPORTANT Music supervisors vet rights as if their lives depended on it. Because they do. And, they expect you to conduct your business in a similar matter. That’s because a music supervisor’s job involves a lot more than picking music for a project or sitting with a director brainstorming – they’re also responsible for making sure that the tracks chosen for a project are properly cleared for use in a visual media project. In other words, it’s literally their ass, their reputation, their livelihood on the line. If a music supervisor uses a track that hasn’t been properly cleared, not only will this hurt their career and reputation, but it could have massive financial and legal repercussions when the visual media company or project they worked with has to correct the error. Movies, TV shows, ad campaigns, trailers, video games – there are examples of all of them being pulled (at great cost) post-release to be re-synced after legal teams discovered music rights weren’t properly cleared or couldn’t be cleared after the release. And who do you think is left holding the bag when that $50 Million film ad campaign is postponed for two weeks while the studio re-syncs the film’s title track? The answer to that question is obvious – the music supervisor. And this is why, when you speak to music supervisors, when you come to our conferences and when you read articles like this, all the music supervisors emphasize their preference for “one-stop” deals over and over again. They want and need rights that are clear and simple if you plan on doing business with them. In fact, this is so important that some TV production companies and film studios ONLY let music supervisors work with music from an approved list of publishers, artists and labels. Why? Simply put, loss prevention and mitigation of risk. And while this may stifle creativity, frankly some studios have been burned so many times that would rather put blinders on the creative people behind projects rather than expose themselves to potential losses. The good news is that most visual media producers are not so rigid. Most allow music supervisors, producers and directors a good deal of freedom to select music from a creative point of view, which is good for them and good for you. Music supervisors really do want to do business with new people and find new music – just don’t make their jobs any harder than they already are. If you meet a music supervisor, don’t say you rep one-stop tracks or that you’re a one-stop shop unless you’re 100% sure you have ALL the master and publisher rights for any tracks you own, represent or make. WHAT A REAL ONE-STOP IS So what is a one-stop really? In its most basic form, its extremely clearcut – a “one stop” is a track that has all assigned rights clreared, and a “one-stop shop” is a library, publisher, label or other rights owner, creator or holder authorized to represent all assignable rights to a particular track or set of tracks for sync licensing. This means publishing and master rights must be 100% pre-cleared. Not half, not some, but all your rights better be airtight. And this means not only having the master rights for a track properly cleared and accounted for, but making sure that you’ve also accounted for and cleared every possible publishing right. So if you are going to say you rep/own a one-stop track, or are a one-stop shop, you’ve got to make sure of the following:
That’s not so hard right? Follow these three rules and you’ll be in great stead with music supervisors, and you’ll be seen as a “go-to” person by the music supes – just as long as your music’s decent and you help them do their jobs efficiently – but that’s a subject for a future post. Post Courtesy of: |
BLOG
Some of our submission and showcase partners
6 Comments
Thanks for the information. It is very helpful.
Hi. How exactly this article applies to indie music which is all played, recorded and produced at home studios, with originally created samples, as well as to artists who are pitching directly original music with all these characteristics?
Thanks for your thoughts. This article applies to anyone who is thinking about having their music placed – if samples are created by the artist then they are original and the artist retains the rights to them. If they are using samples they found through their home studio software then they must make sure they have the appropriate rights to those samples before they try to get the music placed.
The article is meant to help advise artists about what rights they should have in place before pitching their music for placement.
Nice post. Very interesting
I produced an adaptation of public domain classical music eg:
Mozart-Chopin etc by adding various rhythm tracks and solos
To actually make them very danceable.
Can I now consider them my masters and publishing.
One stop so to speak. Fb
the article is very helpful